Case studies · Forensic Medicine · 12 November 2026

Firearm injury – distinguishing suicidal from homicidal shooting case study

The case

Patient: 28‑year‑old male, unmarried, found unconscious in a locked bedroom.

Presenting complaint: No verbal response; GCS 6 (E1 V1 M4).

History (obtained from relatives and police):

Examination (in the emergency department):

Parameter Value
Airway Patent, but patient is obtunded; orotracheal intubation performed
Breathing RR 22 /min, decreased breath sounds over right hemithorax
Circulation HR 118 /min, BP 94/58 mm Hg, peripheral pulses weak
Disability GCS 6 (E1 V1 M4)
Exposure Right anterior chest: 2 cm oval entry wound, no obvious exit wound; surrounding abrasion ring 1 cm; stippling present up to 2 cm from wound margin. No other external injuries.
Vital signs Temp 36.8 °C, SpO₂ 92 % on 100 % FiO₂ (post‑intubation)
Neurological Pupils equal, 3 mm, sluggish reaction to light

Initial investigations:

The patient is taken emergently to the operating theatre for right thoracotomy.


Questions

  1. What is the most likely primary diagnosis based on the clinical picture?
  2. List the forensic findings that help differentiate a suicidal from a homicidal firearm injury in this case.
  3. Which additional investigations are essential for both medical management and forensic documentation?
  4. Outline the initial management according to ATLS 2023 guidelines for a penetrating chest trauma with hemodynamic compromise.
  5. Discuss the potential complications and the legal/psychiatric follow‑up required after the acute phase.

Answers

1. Primary diagnosis

The primary diagnosis is penetrating gunshot wound (GSW) to the right chest with hemopneumothorax and possible cardiac injury.

Reasoning:

2. Forensic findings that distinguish suicidal from homicidal shooting

Finding Suicidal pattern Homicidal pattern Relevance to this case
Scene security Door locked from inside, no signs of forced entry, victim’s personal firearm present. Door often unlocked or signs of struggle; weapon may belong to another person. Locked door, victim’s own pistol → supports suicide.
Weapon‑to‑victim relationship Victim’s own firearm, often registered to them. Weapon may be foreign or multiple firearms present. Recovered pistol matches victim’s ownership (verified by registration).
Wound characteristics Single shot, often in self‑inflicted locations (head, chest, abdomen) with a predictable trajectory (e.g., right anterior chest to left ventricle). Multiple wounds, atypical trajectories, defensive injuries (e.g., bruises on forearms). Single entry wound, no defensive injuries → points to suicide.
Stippling and soot pattern Concentrated around entry wound, indicating close‑range discharge (≤ 2 cm). May be absent or present at a distance (> 2 cm). Stippling up to 2 cm suggests close‑range, consistent with self‑inflicted shot.
Bullet trajectory Straight line from entry to internal target; often aligns with a plausible self‑inflicted path. Irregular or impossible trajectory for self‑infliction (e.g., upward from lower limb). Trajectory from right anterior chest toward mediastinum is plausible for a self‑inflicted shot.
Blood spatter Minimal or absent on surrounding surfaces; blood mainly on victim. Blood spatter on walls, floor, or other objects indicating movement or struggle. No blood spatter noted elsewhere; supports suicide.
Psychiatric history Documented depression, recent stressors, suicide notes. Usually absent; may have a motive for homicide. Recent depressive symptoms and a text resembling a suicide note are present.

Collectively, the locked room, close‑range entry wound with stippling, single shot, victim’s own firearm, and recent psychosocial stressors strongly favor a suicidal manner of death. However, a thorough forensic autopsy and ballistic analysis are mandatory to exclude foul play.

3. Additional investigations

Medical:

Forensic:

These investigations serve dual purposes: guiding life‑saving treatment and providing objective data for legal determination of manner of death.

4. Initial management (ATLS 2023)

  1. Primary Survey (ABCDE):

    • A – Airway: Immediate orotracheal intubation with rapid sequence induction (RSI) because GCS ≤ 8.
    • B – Breathing: 100 % O₂, assess chest wall; large right hemothorax → place a large‑caliber (36‑40 Fr) chest tube in the 5th intercostal space, anterior to mid‑axillary line.
    • C – Circulation: Two large‑bore IV lines; initiate crystalloid bolus (1 L isotonic saline) followed by blood products if MAP < 65 mm Hg or ongoing bleeding (massive transfusion protocol: PRBC : FFP : Platelets = 1 : 1 : 1).
    • D – Disability: Re‑assess GCS after airway control; monitor pupils.
    • E – Exposure: Full body exam; prevent hypothermia (warm blankets, fluid warmers).
  2. Adjuncts:

    • FAST already performed; pericardial effusion → consider emergent pericardiocentesis if tamponade signs develop.
    • Chest X‑ray confirms tube placement and bullet location.
  3. Definitive Hemorrhage Control:

    • Right thoracotomy (anterolateral) indicated for massive hemothorax (> 1500 mL initial output or > 200 mL/h) and suspected cardiac injury.
    • Control of bleeding: repair of lung laceration, ligation of intercostal vessels, evacuation of pericardial blood, and removal of bullet if feasible.
  4. Post‑operative care:

    • ICU admission, continued mechanical ventilation, hemodynamic monitoring, repeat imaging, and analgesia.

All steps follow the ATLS 2023 protocol, which emphasizes rapid control of airway, breathing, and circulation while simultaneously gathering forensic data.

5. Potential complications and follow‑up

Medical complications

Complication Pathophysiology Early detection
Cardiac tamponade Accumulation of blood in pericardial sac → obstructive shock. Persistent hypotension, muffled heart sounds, JVD; bedside echo.
Massive hemothorax / re‑bleeding Incomplete control of pulmonary or intercostal vessels. Chest tube output > 200 mL/h for 3 h; repeat imaging.
Infection (empyema, mediastinitis) Contamination from bullet and tissue injury. Fever, leukocytosis, purulent drainage; CT chest.
Pulmonary contusion / ARDS Blast effect of bullet and blood loss. Hypoxemia refractory to O₂, bilateral infiltrates on CXR/CT.
Neurovascular injury (if bullet traverses brachial plexus or major vessels) Direct laceration. Neurological deficits, expanding hematoma.
Long‑term sequelae: chronic pain, post‑traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Persistent nociceptive input; psychological trauma. Patient‑reported symptoms; validated scales.

Legal/psychiatric follow‑up


Key learning points


Practice MCQs

1. Which of the following wound characteristics most strongly indicates a close‑range firearm discharge?
A. Absence of soot on the skin
B. Presence of an abrasion ring > 5 cm from the wound
C. Powder stippling confined within 2 cm of the entry wound
D. Large irregular exit wound

Answer: C — Powder stippling (tattooing) limited to ≤ 2 cm from the entry wound is typical of a close‑range shot (< 2 cm).

2. According to ATLS 2023, the threshold for immediate thoracotomy in a patient with a penetrating chest injury is:
A. Initial chest tube output > 500 mL
B. Initial chest tube output > 1500 mL or > 200 mL/h for 3 h
C. Any hemothorax with hypotension
D. Presence of a pericardial effusion on FAST

Answer: B — Massive hemothorax is defined as > 1500 mL initial output or > 200 mL/h for 3 h, prompting emergent thoracotomy.

3. In distinguishing suicidal from homicidal gunshot wounds, which forensic finding is least reliable?
A. Locked‑room scenario
B. Presence of a suicide note
C. Number of entry wounds
D. Type of firearm used

Answer: D — The type of firearm (e.g., caliber) does not reliably differentiate intent; the same weapon can be used in both suicide and homicide.

Practise cases like this one

Get a new patient case, answer the examiner's questions by voice or text, and get marked — free.

Try a case on MEDOST

More in Forensic Medicine

Sudden cardiac death in young athletes – forensic perspectiveSuicidal hanging case studyCaseFirearm Injuries – BallisticsSudden Cardiac Death in Young Athletes

The patient is invented for teaching. AI-assisted study material for exam revision. Always confirm with standard textbooks and current guidelines; not medical advice.