Case studies · Orthopaedics · 5 November 2026

Femoral neck fracture in an elderly patient case study

The case

Patient: 78‑year‑old male, retired farmer

Presenting complaint: Sudden onset right hip pain after a fall, 3 hours ago.

History of presenting illness:

Past medical history:

Drug history: As above, plus occasional paracetamol for knee pain.

Allergies: No known drug allergies.

Social history:

Family history: Father died of myocardial infarction at 70 y; mother had hip fracture at 82 y.

Examination:

Parameter Value
General Alert, in pain, lying supine, unable to move right lower limb
Vital signs BP 148/86 mmHg, HR 92 bpm, RR 18 /min, Temp 36.8 °C, SpO₂ 97 % on room air
Inspection Right lower limb appears shortened and externally rotated compared with left
Palpation Tenderness over the right groin, no open wound
Range of motion Active and passive hip flexion/extension limited by pain; internal rotation painful
Neurovascular Dorsalis pedis pulse palpable, sensation intact in all dermatomes
Musculoskeletal No other joint swelling or deformity
Other systems Unremarkable

Initial investigations:

Test Result
Plain anteroposterior (AP) pelvis X‑ray Intracapsular fracture of the right femoral neck, Garden type II (incomplete, <50 % displacement)
Lateral hip X‑ray Confirmed fracture line, minimal posterior displacement
CBC Hb 12.4 g/dL, WBC 8.2 × 10⁹/L, Platelets 210 × 10⁹/L
Serum electrolytes Na 138 mmol/L, K 4.2 mmol/L, Cl 102 mmol/L
Renal function Creatinine 1.0 mg/dL, eGFR 78 mL/min/1.73 m²
Blood glucose (fasting) 112 mg/dL
Calcium, phosphate, ALP Ca 9.2 mg/dL, PO₄ 3.5 mg/dL, ALP 85 U/L
ECG Normal sinus rhythm, no ischemia
Pre‑operative chest X‑ray Clear lung fields, no cardiomegaly

The patient is admitted to orthopaedic trauma ward, kept nil per os, and analgesia with IV paracetamol 1 g q6h and tramadol 50 mg q8h PRN.


Questions

  1. What is the most likely diagnosis and which clinical and radiological findings support it?
  2. Classify the fracture according to the Garden and AO/OTA systems and explain the prognostic significance of each classification.
  3. Outline the pre‑operative optimisation steps required for this patient, citing current guidelines (2023‑2024).
  4. Discuss the surgical management options for an intracapsular femoral neck fracture in an elderly patient, and indicate which option is most appropriate for this case, providing justification.
  5. List the early and late complications of femoral neck fracture fixation in the elderly and the strategies to prevent or manage them.

Answers

1. Diagnosis

Diagnosis: Intracapsular (femoral neck) fracture of the right hip, Garden type II.

Supporting clinical findings

Supporting radiological findings

These features together make an intracapsular femoral neck fracture the most likely diagnosis.


2. Fracture classification

System Category for this case Description Prognostic relevance
Garden Type II Incomplete fracture with <50 % displacement; the femoral head remains partially aligned with the shaft. Lower risk of avascular necrosis (AVN) compared with Types III‑IV, but still a high risk in the elderly because of compromised blood supply and poor bone quality.
AO/OTA 31‑B1.3 “Basicervical” fracture: subcapital, non‑displaced, extra‑articular. Indicates a relatively stable fracture pattern; however, in patients >65 y the risk of fixation failure is higher, influencing the choice of arthroplasty versus internal fixation.

Why classification matters


3. Pre‑operative optimisation (2023‑2024 guidelines)

a. Cardiovascular assessment – According to the 2023 American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Programs and the 2024 British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) – NICE guidelines, all patients >65 y with hip fracture should undergo a rapid cardiac risk assessment:

b. Glycaemic control – NICE NG38 (2023) recommends target fasting glucose 80‑130 mg/dL and random <180 mg/dL.

c. Bone health optimisation – Osteoporosis treatment should be continued; calcium 1 g and vitamin D 800‑1000 IU daily are adequate.

d. Anaesthetic considerations – Regional (spinal) anaesthesia is preferred for hip fracture in the elderly (NICE NG38, 2023) because it reduces pulmonary complications and postoperative delirium.

e. Thromboprophylaxis – Start low‑molecular‑weight heparin (LMWH) e.g., enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously once daily as soon as haemostasis is secured (within 12 h post‑op).

f. Pain control – Multimodal analgesia: scheduled paracetamol, low‑dose opioid PRN, and consider a fascia‑iliaca block pre‑operatively (recommended by 2024 AAOS guidelines).

g. Nutritional assessment – Serum albumin 3.5 g/dL is the threshold; if low, provide protein‑rich supplements.

h. Timing – Surgery should be performed within 24‑48 h of admission (BOA 2024) to reduce mortality and complications.


4. Surgical management options

Option Description Indications in elderly Advantages Disadvantages
Internal fixation (IF) – multiple cannulated screws or a dynamic hip screw (DHS) Preserves native hip; suitable for non‑displaced fractures (Garden I‑II) Patients with good bone stock, low surgical risk, and expected compliance with weight‑bearing restrictions Higher failure rate (10‑30 %) in >65 y due to poor bone quality; risk of AVN and non‑union
Hemiarthroplasty (HA) – unipolar or bipolar prosthesis Replaces femoral head; retains acetabulum Displaced intracapsular fractures (Garden III‑IV) or when fixation is unlikely to succeed Shorter operative time than total hip arthroplasty (THA); risk of acetabular erosion over time
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) – cemented or cementless Replaces both femoral head and acetabulum Active, cognitively intact patients >65 y with displaced fractures, low‑impact lifestyle Longer surgery, higher blood loss, higher dislocation risk, but better functional outcome

Most appropriate option for this case: Cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty

Justification

  1. Age and bone quality – 78 y with osteoporosis; fixation has a higher risk of cut‑out.
  2. Fracture type – Although Garden II is non‑displaced, the AO/OTA 31‑B1.3 pattern in an elderly patient still carries a substantial risk of secondary displacement.
  3. Functional demand – The patient is low‑activity (uses a cane), making HA a reasonable balance between surgical risk and functional outcome.
  4. Guideline support – BOA 2024 guideline recommends HA for patients >65 y with intracapsular fractures when the patient is not a high‑functioning candidate for THA.
  5. Operative considerations – Cemented stem provides immediate stability in osteoporotic bone, allowing early mobilisation (within 24 h).

5. Complications and their management

Early (within 30 days)

Complication Incidence in elderly Prevention / Management
Surgical site infection (SSI) 1‑3 % Pre‑op skin antisepsis, peri‑operative IV cefazolin 2 g (or clindamycin if MRSA risk), glycaemic control, wound care. If infection occurs, debridement and targeted antibiotics.
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) / pulmonary embolism (PE) 5‑10 % without prophylaxis LMWH started within 12 h post‑op, mechanical compression devices, early mobilisation. Treat DVT with therapeutic LMWH or DOAC.
Peri‑operative delirium 15‑30 % Adequate pain control, avoid benzodiazepines, maintain sleep‑wake cycle, early mobilisation, reorientation. Manage with low‑dose haloperidol if severe.
Cardiovascular events (MI, arrhythmia) 5‑10 % Optimise cardiac status, intra‑operative monitoring, avoid hypotension. Treat according to ACLS protocols.
Blood loss / anemia Up to 15 % require transfusion Use tranexamic acid (1 g IV before incision) as per 2023 AAOS guideline; restrict transfusion to Hb < 8 g/dL (or symptomatic).

Late (months to years)

Complication Frequency Prevention / Management
Avascular necrosis (AVN) of femoral head 5‑15 % after IF; <5 % after HA Choose HA over IF in high‑risk patients; monitor with serial radiographs; if AVN develops after IF, conversion to arthroplasty is indicated.
Non‑union 5‑10 % after IF Adequate reduction and stable fixation; if non‑union occurs, revision fixation or arthroplasty.
Implant failure / cut‑out 10‑20 % after IF in osteoporotic bone Use cemented HA; ensure proper stem positioning (neutral alignment, adequate fill).
Acetabular erosion (specific to HA) 10‑20 % at 5 y Use bipolar prosthesis; consider conversion to THA if symptomatic.
Post‑operative hip pain 10‑15 % Assess for loosening, infection, or trochanteric bursitis; treat accordingly.
Mortality 10‑30 % within 1 y Early surgery, multidisciplinary care, fall prevention programmes.

Key preventive strategies – early surgery (<48 h), multidisciplinary orthogeriatric care, aggressive DVT prophylaxis, optimal pain control, and early weight‑bearing as tolerated.


Key learning points


Practice MCQs

1. A 78‑year‑old woman presents with a Garden II femoral neck fracture. Which of the following is the most appropriate surgical treatment according to the 2024 BOA guideline?

A. Closed reduction and percutaneous cannulated screw fixation
B. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation
C. Cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty
D. Total hip arthroplasty

Answer: C — Cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty is recommended for elderly patients with intracapsular fractures when bone quality is poor, even if the fracture is non‑displaced, to avoid fixation failure.


2. Which of the following postoperative measures has the strongest evidence for reducing the incidence of delirium in elderly hip‑fracture patients?

A. Routine use of benzodiazepines for anxiety
B. Early mobilisation within 24 h
C. High‑dose opioid analgesia
D. Prolonged fasting until day 3

Answer: B — Early mobilisation, combined with adequate pain control and sleep hygiene, is the most effective strategy to prevent delirium (AAOS 2023 recommendation).


3. A patient with an intracapsular femoral neck fracture undergoes internal fixation with three cannulated screws. Six weeks later, radiographs show progressive collapse of the femoral head. The most likely diagnosis is:

A. Deep infection
B. Avascular necrosis
C. Heterotopic ossification
D. Periprosthetic fracture

Answer: B — Collapse of the femoral head after fixation suggests avascular necrosis, a known complication of intracapsular fractures due to disruption of the retinacular vessels.


Practise cases like this one

Get a new patient case, answer the examiner's questions by voice or text, and get marked — free.

Try a case on MEDOST

More in Orthopaedics

Avulsion fracture of tibial tuberosityHip Fracture Management in Elderly

The patient is invented for teaching. AI-assisted study material for exam revision. Always confirm with standard textbooks and current guidelines; not medical advice.